> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.noon.capital/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.noon.capital/3.-the-yield-engine/yield-strategies/bdcs.md).

# BDCs

### <mark style="background-color:$danger;">Analysed and not deployed.</mark>

{% hint style="info" %}

### Following the published analysis, the community voted against adding BDCs to the deployment basket. The analysis remains here so the reasoning stays on the record

{% endhint %}

## <mark style="color:$primary;">What are BDCs</mark>

A Business Development Company (BDC) is a publicly traded vehicle that finances small and mid-sized US businesses, typically through senior secured loans and structured debt. BDCs are legally required to distribute at least 90% of their taxable income as dividends, which is why their yields run high, typically in the 8–12% range, and why income investors hold them. **NAV** (net asset value) is the per-share value of the underlying loan book, against which the market price trades at a premium or discount.

BDCs are similar of the [private credit funds](/3.-the-yield-engine/yield-strategies/private-credit.md) already in Noon's basket, with one defining trade-off: public listing gives BDCs much deeper liquidity, and in exchange exposes holders to public-market price volatility that a private fund structure doesn't transmit.

The evaluation screened the prominent names in the space: GSBD (Goldman Sachs BDC), BCSF (Bain Capital Specialty Finance), GBDC (Golub Capital BDC), ARCC (Ares Capital), BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending), MAIN (Main Street Capital), and BIZD (VanEck's ETF holding a basket of BDCs). The deeper analysis focused on three, **as of the analysis date.**

## <mark style="color:purple;">Noon</mark> <mark style="color:$primary;">Deployment Analysis: Summary</mark>

<figure><img src="https://3816918787-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FL26rQzcNmiUZrCXkxkjS%2Fuploads%2FN6hZYUgUxUIHwvy8OTTn%2FNOON%20Deployment%20Analysis%20BDCs.png?alt=media&amp;token=d22f121c-458c-40ac-a647-ac0ae7e3d498" alt=""><figcaption></figcaption></figure>

## <mark style="color:$primary;">Why the community voted not to deploy</mark>

The analysts' initial assessment, published openly for three weeks of community discussion before the vote, concluded that BDCs offer high yield with potentially high volatility: their equity-like price behaviour and drawdown potential sit poorly within a stability-first mandate, even where the underlying loan books perform. During the COVID drawdown (March 2020), BDC prices fell far more sharply than their underlying credit performance justified, illustrating exactly that transmission. The community voted accordingly and the proposal was rejected.

The door isn't welded shut. Per the evaluation's own framing, a better-structured vehicle, a viable hedge, or a tokenised version could reopen the question through a governance proposal. Not deployed means not deployed now.

## <mark style="color:$primary;">Documents</mark>

* A full risk assessment can be found archived in <mark style="color:purple;">**Noon's**</mark> [**Governance Forum**](https://forum.noon.capital/t/risk-assessment-jaaa-clo/25/10)
* Primer: [**BDCs Primer**](https://596450103-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FvawK0RJiR8PpG791Q3EH%2Fuploads%2FBxu70XvjyHEc2T9HoNNn%2FBDC%20Primer.pdf?alt=media\&token=082341c6-be4f-4fd2-a36c-185901e026f2)